My last post described our trip to the lovely city of Harrogate and now I’d like to focus on the conference we attended there: that of the International Association of Teachers of English to Foreign Learners. People arrived at the venue from all over the world, often re-establishing contacts from previous such events.
Two topics I thought interesting were “Practical
Critical Thinking Activities for the Language Classroom’ and ‘Motivating
Teens to Talk’. Teachers are always grateful for practical tips on
methodology and motivation.
The Plenary session on “Workplace English’
shed new light on developments in the domain of language learners within their
professional context. The concept of ‘dropping ‘language teachers in to the
workplace to deliver a quick language ‘injection’ is no longer considered
valid. The language teacher would ideally be a member of a corporate training
team of experts and experienced operators responsible for drawing up and presenting
an educational program. Trainees are seen as ‘users’ rather than ‘learners’ and
their efforts would be assessed by performance outcome rather than isolated
indicators. This offered an interesting perspective as to where English for
Specific Purposes/ Business English may be heading.
The next
session worthy of note (but not necessarily in a good way! ☹) was entitled ‘Sharing Words and Worlds’ in
the context of teaching English to refugees, migrants and asylum seekers. Citing
UN statistics showing that in 2022 one hundred million displaced people entered
the USA, the speaker deduced that
learning English is vital in establishing place and voice for these learners.
She advocated that teachers prepare a Paedagogy of Politics wherein their roles
are:
Ally to compensate for
inequality
Advocate to stand up for rights
Activist to be an agent of change.
This did not sit well with me as it echoed the
now passe concept of language specialists being ’dropped’ in, this time with an
underlying political agenda rather than with a pre-ordained syllabus. Such a
case was when at the height of our refugee deluge from Turkey, some NGO
personnel in Greece refused to cooperate with government agencies lest their
freedom to operate their own policies be curtailed.
Now it goes without saying that we want the lot
of refugees to be improved, but each country has its own infrastuctures and
organisations designed to do that. Surely it’s their prerogative to assess
where and to whom the facilities and services that they have available can be
best put to use?
The session presenter showed a video clip
showing a particular refugee who was describing his personal plight, but he was
employing the services of a translator to do that. Later on it transpired that
he had been in this English speaking country for ten years! This made me wonder
if these resources were being directed to the right person. To be so long in
the country and not communicate even at a basic level of English indicated
something was not right. Fellow-delegates
near me in the session agreed we were being manipulated into emoting over this
individual in a variety of ways and did not join in the standing ovation
afforded at session-end. Rather than have our emotional strings pulled, we were
ready to consider the many implications that the talk had generated.
Our critical analysis of the talk was confirmed
very soon afterwards when we phoned to book a taxi to take us to a local park
where we were to meet up with my family. We were told the driver would call us
on his arrival at our pick-up point. And so he did. But as we approached the
cab, he was reluctant to acknowledge that we were his actual fare. We fast
assessed that reasoning with him was well nigh impossible, given his language
level was so low. He accepted us only after we suggested calling the client
again, and it was the phone ring-tone rather than verbal appeals that saved the
day!
My point? This Bangladeshi man had lived in
Yorkshire for 7 years, was a taxi driver whose communicative competence was
very low indeed - even with the use of GPS support he was really struggling
….and initially took us to the wrong park. :O AND this was despite the combined
efforts of four highly-trained language teaching specialists!!
I guess it was a case of cabbies for courses.
No comments:
Post a Comment